Challenges To Core Banking Solutions Implementation Projects – Part 1
Imran Adeel Haider
Pakistan has seen many banks will find new core banking solutions in the recent past. The best performing companies are the following: 1. Temenos T24 (Seven banks) 2. Sungard SYMBOLS (three banks) 3. Misys (two banks) and Pakistan is not the only country in the world is for such solutions. Banks in the Middle East have also bought the same core banking solutions to provide a wide range of services to their clients, using integrated information systems newly built. Using existing systems, it was a distant dream. consumer financing, based on the rapidly increasing number of rich and middle class, forcing banks to opt for better systems and not rely on their existing legacy applications – rather an archipelago of applications. Enter the new applications – or their new versions, and business people have been enamored of these applications from the outset. There are not many sellers and implementation of these solutions, so we can be sure they would be very very tight for delivery. There are tons of things that need to be changed in the basic retractable CD / DVD. For an Islamic country, things like deducting Zakat (mandatory alms yearly. 2 5%) are not available, and systems must be modified. These changes are usually from local suppliers, which is implementing the solution to the bank. And then you start to see problems. Lack of knowledge about the property TechnologyImplementing people are not aware of the application and its underlying technology: they try to run things on what they learned in college, using C # or Java. Most core banking solutions do not use one of these tools and platforms. Lack of knowledge about the property SystemImplementers were not there when the application was built / engineering. So they have no idea of things under the hood. This lack of knowledge constitutes a major threat. Although the application vendor trains its implementing partners, it is obvious they can not train a large number of engineers of the company implementation. In addition, suppliers are themselves the broader application delivery, and can not spend much time away from being implemented and the development of future releases / patches / patch application. No ProcessDue QA strict deadlines and overexploited resources, developers can not find it worthwhile to have a quality assurance process to ensure delivery by the standard, assuming that there were standards set for all . Scope creep occurs CreepScope among business users of banks, as they have no idea how much the new application, and they are used for the older application. When they see what is happening is when they realize they did not want it that way. This brings us to the next point. Customization to users can actually SystemBusiness previous published the new system, feel and act like the old system. Worse yet, they can do it completely unconscious. Therefore, this question must be asked time and again, so they double-check everything before asking. Timelines unrealistic BanksBanks may set overly ambitious deadlines for the completion of the project. We have seen projects in many years of delay due to one of the reasons we’re discussing. In a way, each bank thinks he has assessed the timeline right, and it can handle things. But as we know in the IT world, it’s late or it does not work. Timelines unrealistic ImplementersTo beat the competition and win the order, the supplier of banking solutions also agree with the aggressive schedule and realistic – the time that even they know can not answer. The lack of implementation resources (functional and technical) Lack of hits suppliers / implementation very difficult. There are many banks are going for such solutions, both locally and internationally. This brings the workforce exposed to offers from all over the world. In the case of T24, we saw offers being extended to those not even mention the word T24 in their LinkedIn profile. And since the banks in Singapore, Hong Kong and the Middle East pay in USD or AED, people from Pakistan and India is very attractive to opt for such missions. Local employers mitigate this risk by requiring employees to sign bonds for three years with their staff before the train, but that does not help much, the new employer are happily willing to pay the wages of their time remaining at their current employer, after all, they must put their faces in front of their bank customer (s) who would pay much higher than a bank in Pakistan to be a local director. Terms of subjugating Consultants / EngineersConsequently, director imposes restrictive conditions to his people that many feel angry and mistrust. They give the chance to get out of there, and they usually take too. Cash burnout due to high SalariesTo counter the brain drain, the performer, and offers higher wages to keep people on board. These earnings are close or equal to what the employer will provide the Middle East or the Far East. This obviously strains of profitability and cash flows of the company implementation and management loses interest in the project. This exacerbates the cycle of the project. To be concluded. . . This blog is also available at http://www. sapphireconsultingservices. com / scsblog / blogs and http://imranadeel. WordPress. com


